I’m fairly new to the skeptical movement. While I’ve long been a fan of critical thinking and the scientific method, it’s only been in the last year or two that I’ve been actively seeking out the skeptical community through online forums, SkeptiCamp, and podcasts. I’m enjoying being a member of this community, and the longer I hang around, the more I learn, and the more I sharpen my critical thinking skills.
However, there’s one thing that bothers me about our community, and that’s the inherent assumption that someone who self-identifies as a skeptic is automatically assumed to also be an atheist. This first came to my attention during last year’s Colorado SkeptiCamp 2, where many of the speakers made the assumption that the audience was predominantly atheist.
Subsequent research revealed a perception of the skeptical movement where atheism always equaled skepticism, and vice versa. This bothers me.
I think making this association, and allowing it to go unchallenged in mainstream media, hurts the skeptical movement. While there are clearly a large number of skeptics who also consider themselves atheists, the designations are not necessarily mutually inclusive. By insinuating they are, the skeptical movement essentially excludes the majority of humanity from even joining the conversation.
I know many people who would be considered critical thinkers by any reasonable standard and would be a fine addition to the ranks of the skeptics. But to a greater or lesser degree, they’re people of faith, and feel their personal beliefs preclude them from engaging with us. This assumption that being a person of faith and being a skeptic are mutually exclusive roles keeps them from adding their voice to the discussion, and we’re the poorer for it. Since they believe their faith will be mocked and ridiculed, they choose not to address areas of mutual concern, such as Intelligent Design in public schools, alternative medicine, the anti-vaccination movement and many more.
I’m not talking about inviting Young Earth Creationists or the Westboro Baptist Church to the table to discuss separation of church and state, but including liberal, progressive people of faith to join us in discussing areas of mutual interest. To do so is to everyone’s benefit. Promoting critical thought, science-based medicine, and the protection of the innocent from the purveyors of woo is an agenda where atheists, agnostics and people of faith can all agree on the common good.
Let’s not inadvertently exclude potential allies by being unnecessarily exclusive.
___________________________________________________________________________
Janiece Murphy is, in no particular order, a Navy veteran, a systems engineer, an amateur skeptic, a fan-girl of science, a student, a dirty, dirty liberal, and a blogger. This entry has been cross-posted at Hot Chicks Dig Smart Men.
April 6, 2009 at 12:28 am
Having spoken (via email) with one of the leaders of the first incarnation of the Bay Area Skeptics, he was quite proud of having clergy as members of the organization.
When skepticism isn’t seen as a set of tools but rather as a set of beliefs, then we’ve lost its value. We’ve closed our minds to letting reliable evidence and reason lead the way and instead are just parroting the latest intellectual fad.
I may be atheist, but my skepticism is of far greater value to me.
April 6, 2009 at 10:41 am
[By assuming that atheism and skepticism are the same, "the skeptical movement essentially excludes the majority of humanity from even joining the conversation."
Hear, hear. I couldn't agree more. (You may be interested to know that this is a repeating theme within the “What Do I Do Next?” PDF.)
I’m tempted to make a t-shirt that says, “You don’t have to be against god to be against fraud.”
April 6, 2009 at 11:56 am
It’s interesting, because the people of faith who read my own blog have told me that the skeptical movement makes them feel alienated, in spite of having an active interest in the “tools” Reed refers to.
The fact that some skeptics try to be inclusive is not resulting in the message getting out there. I think we need better P.R…
April 8, 2009 at 12:56 pm
I am really glad to read your entry. My husband and I talk on this topic often. We both happen to be non-believers but many of our dearest friends and families are believers. While I very much want to help them and many other sharpen their critical thinking skills the last thing I want is to strip from them the peace they feel from believing in a god or gods. Critical thinking is a tool that all humans need but if through our assumptions about faith we cause people to avoid using the tool we have lost battle before we have even begun.
April 8, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Heather, you’re most welcome, and I appreciate the kind words. Because I know so many people of faith who have intellects I respect and admire, I can’t bring myself to exclude them from an intellectual movement that is supposed to value open-mindedness. Faith, by definition, is an unfalsifiable proposition, and I think it’s presumptuous in the extreme to assume that your personal answer should be one-size-fits-all – regardless of which camp your answer falls into.
August 9, 2009 at 10:22 am
It sounds like you guys are thorough in the fact that you all have a motive, allow skepticism to expand amoung the god-fearing types, so now i would say all you need is just concrete evidence that of those who join and are god-fearing types (which i am guessing is a lesser portion) are proven to not turn atheist be being a skeptic. The main fact for those who are god-fearing types is probably that they will not join if they are worried about being in a community where they might possibly be accosted by those who are atheists or something of the sort. There are many options to explore, but i agree with Janiece Murphy when it comes to needing much better PR. It is difficult to compete with slandering media these days. When it comes to the United States media (as i assume is what this involes) slandering of anyone possible is a triumph
November 22, 2010 at 1:27 am
you can say that alternative medicine is cheaper too and usually comes from natural sources ~’.
November 7, 2012 at 10:12 am
I am genuinely thankful to the owner of this web page
who has shared this fantastic paragraph at at this time.